Will marketing follow on-the-go consumers?

April 11th, 2011 | by: Stephanie Florence
FacebookTwitterGoogle+LinkedInEmailPrintShare

I saw this car driving around town and it got me thinking: with consumers constantly on-the-go is this type of marketing the optimal tactic?

Even a busy person cannot avoid an advertisement directly in front of their face. Are consumers more likely to react to a direct message presented in their everyday routine? And is the Arthur Murray Dance Studiosucceeding in reaching potential dancers who have not considered this particular studio or taking classes in general? 

I believe any type of promotion is good promotion when it comes to activities like dance classes. Let’s face it; Chicago traffic can often get the best of drivers by only adding stress to their day. Providing drivers with a positive message amidst the negativity of the traffic-filled commute can leave a lasting impression on the consumer. Whether this means signing up for class personally, highlighting the opportunity to a friend or discussing the topic via social media, the outcome is mutually beneficial for Arthur Murray and the driver.

Mobile marketing includes this example of literally moving advertising in addition to marketing done via cell phone. If people are reading newspapers in print less and accessing their news online instead, mobile applications have the potential to lead the charge in providing information. Consumers may be avoiding the hassle of carrying around a newspaper, coupons or brochure when all the details can be easily stored in their phone (a staple when most people leave the house each day). Cue the power of QR codes as their sole purpose celebrates the ability to be mobile.

Would you be likely to check out this dance studio (or whatever is promoted in a mobile form)? Do you appreciate having advertising mixed in with your everyday life or would you prefer to simply enjoy your commute?

Thumbs DownThumbs Up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Livin' and Learnin' About the 2009 Super Bowl Ads

January 28th, 2009 | by: Deanna Killackey
FacebookTwitterGoogle+LinkedInEmailPrintShare

I was in a bit of a pickle (NOTE: I had to use this word in order to qualify for the JSH&A blog “Word of the Week” challenge. See last week’s post.) when selecting a topic for this week’s blog.

But, my choice soon became clear when I saw the first Super Bowl commercial unveiled on “Good Morning America” today.  I laughed out loud.  Not at the commercial, but rather at the news anchors’ response to it.  As Diane Sawyer and Robin Roberts sat in silence, Sam Champion and Chris Cuomo rolled on the floor in laughter after watching the new Pepsi Max commercial.  The commercial’s main message - that men are tough enough for anything, except diet soda – was right on target.  It had the men laughing up a storm.

According to various reports, NBC still has advertising spots to fill and is slashing rates by roughly $1 million to move the final units. The fact that NBC is still working to sell ad space underscores the dismal state of the media economy.  Some advertisers including FedEx and General Motors have pulled out of the game.  Others, have refined their message to reflect the sensitivity to the recession.  For example, Kellogg’s Frosted Flakes is asking viewers to nominate a child whose playing field should be rebuilt by the company for free.

But, not everyone is shying away.  At least three companies – Pedigree, Denny’s and Teleflora – are running their very first Super Bowl ad and Anheuser Bush will be back again.

So as you watch the commercials (and the game) this weekend, track your favorites and let me know what you think. And, if you want to see what commercial NBC deemed too sexy for TV, stating it “depicts a level of sexuality exceeding our standards” click here.

Perhaps it isn’t best for family audiences, but I’ll let you decide.

Thumbs DownThumbs Up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...