Social Media + Politics … huh?

February 27th, 2009 | by: JSH&A
FacebookTwitterGoogle+LinkedInEmailPrintShare

To get in the spirit for next week’s Kevin Sullivan presentation at JSH&A (Sullivan is the former White House Communications Director), I thought I would check out how politicians are using social media in their current and upcoming campaigns. 

 

It’s been widely reported how Barack Obama spread the word to young people (more than 2 million people were passionate enough sign out of their usual stomping grounds long enough to create profiles on my.barackobama.com as well as following him on other social media sites) by using social mediums like Facebook, MySpace and Twitter.  It’s been said that Barack Obama gets the Internet and social media the way that Kennedy got TV.  The day after his presidency was announced WhiteHouse.gov was completely revamped and far more user-friendly – something that would have been an afterthought for his predecessors.  Notably, Obama used Flickr & YouTube to get IN on the discussion, rather than relying solely on our generation to listen to his points (smart). 

 

In an article by Kate Gardiner for Medill Reports Chicago, she shares that many of the contenders in the 5th Congressional District primary race in Chicago have joined social mediums like Twitter and Facebook and are using these platforms to gain followers, spread their opinions about major speeches (President Obama’s included) and policy and more.  Some maintain their own pages, while some enlist their staff to “ghost write” their content.  An interesting piece of information to note from Gardiner’s article:  Chicago has the third-highest per capita Twitter use of measured metropolitan areas…so it is likely to have more impact in Chicago than in a smaller city.  We are also the third most-populous city in the nation … coincidence? 

 

I’ll be interested – and keeping an eye out – to see what happens in these races, and to see how politicians quantify their win (or loss) based on their social media efforts.  There’s almost as much research citing the impossibility of measuring and tracking social media’s effect on outcomes as there is about people, companies and politicians who use it to campaign, so it will be interesting to see how the media quantifies these races.  Of course Barack Obama did not win the election because he had lots of Facebook “friends” – but it didn’t hurt his cause.

Thumbs DownThumbs Up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Socializing, Chatting and Hi5-ing, Online

February 11th, 2009 | by: JSH&A
FacebookTwitterGoogle+LinkedInEmailPrintShare

Until five minutes ago, I had never heard of Ning.com, Hi5.com, FuBar.com, or UrbanChat.com … but apparently almost 9 million unique visitors (8,853,003) have, and visit these sites regularly.  That is a LOT of social networking taking place “offsite” (and by that I mean independent of the networking giants Facebook and MySpace).  I have accounts on four of the top five social networking sites and have heard of / done research on another 10 of them.  The remaining 11 … no idea where these (and their millions of visitors) came from.

 

 

I’ve been thinking about the idea of a “social media expert” lately, and the people who claim to be them.  I imagine it’s pretty hard to both claim your expertise, and have time to publicize that knowledge, let alone use and consult those who need it (aka everyone!).  While social media has never been my primary occupation I can’t imagine there are enough hours in the day to explore, try and analyze all of the different platforms and maintain your “expert” status.  While I aspire to be an expert at something, someday I might try to stick to a more static area of study.  Thoughts? 

 

For more on the top 25 social networking sites, click here. 

 

Thumbs DownThumbs Up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Loving Social (and Real) LIF

January 29th, 2009 | by: JSH&A
FacebookTwitterGoogle+LinkedInEmailPrintShare

As in forming actual, real-life social relationships (friendships, romantic relationships, etc.), virtual connections (with people or mediums) are formed based on trial and error.  We stick with what (or who) we like, and let the rest go on their merry way. 

 

I was a MySpace user.  For approximately 47 days.  I created my profile, added a few friends, uploaded some content, took a few surveys … and was over it.  I was already “involved with” Facebook, and that’s where the people I identified with were hanging out.  To me, MySpace was like the date you get asked out on, when you are already in a relationship, and that you are more than happy to politely turn down. 

 

I tried Twitter (am still trying!), but I don’t love it and don’t choose to spend much – if any – of my time with it.  I have 37 followers, and follow about 30 “people” (most of which are actually brands, reporters and news outlets).  I log on maybe once every six or seven days, or when I am alerted that I have a new follower – prompting me to remember that I have an account and update my status and read whatever is on my homepage (usually nothing but PSFK trend alerts, which I’ve read on their website already).  I am not sure how much longer I’ll be a user, or if I will ever understand the social media world’s fascination with the medium, but I am determined to stay “in the game” on Twitter for now.  For me, Twitter is the dating relationship that you want to work, but know is doomed to fail.    

 

On the flipside, I was first turned on to Tumblr about a year ago, and it was love at first sight.  Tumblr is a free microblogging site to which you can post text, photos, video, music, chat and more, all on a customized home page and within a community that makes me feel like a part of something.  I spend time with it, use it and know it like the back of my hand.  I have 171 (and counting!) followers and follow about 100 other users whose posts interest and inform me on a daily basis.  Tumblr is like that one-in-a-million person that you want to spend all of your time with and prove that you are worthy of the same affection. 

 

Why do we “fall for” one medium over the other?  Why do we choose to spend our time with some mediums as opposed to others?  In my opinion, it’s linked to the time and effort we choose to put into the “relationship.”  For people who love to post photos … try Flickr, Shutterfly or Snapfish.  For those who are interested in viewing and sharing video … there is YouTube, iFilm and Vimeo.  If you are a blogger by trend or by trade … there’s Blogspot, WordPress, Tumblr and more. 

 

Just like you pick your partner based on his or her traits and characteristics, so should you pick your social medium of choice.  Make the commitment to spend time with your medium of choice, learning its ins and outs, its likes and dislikes … its personality, and your willingness to adapt … and look forward to a long, meaningful relationship as you become an expert at _____insert your social medium here_____.

Thumbs DownThumbs Up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...